![]() |
|
EXHIBITIONS 2011 ![]() What is more important than love? What is more fulfilling
and
thrilling than meeting one’s other half, the only being in the world
that
complements one perfectly? In his latest series of acrylics on canvas It Takes Two (2010), Coplu celebrates
the miracle of love. Using an extraordinary palette of bright colours,
he
stages two characters, a man and a woman, going through different
stages
towards harmony. The artist is no naïf – he is fully aware that
daily life is
much harsher than the round and vivid universe he depicts in his work.
But
together these pieces form a manifesto. Coplu purposefully embraces the
positive side of existence; his paintings are an ode to happiness, joy,
humour
and love.
The figure of the heart-butterfly is the leitmotif of this series. The wings of the colourful creature are shaped like that almost-universal symbol of passion, and each wing is totally essential to the other; the heart-butterfly couldn’t come into being with only one of them. Like love, it takes two to be. In Coalescence of Lovely Souls, this motif remerges as the heads of two lovers sitting side by side. Together, they are one blossoming heart. Cropping up in various forms, canvas after canvas, the heart-butterfly gives a strong pictorial coherence to the series – and yet there is no feeling of repetition, as Coplu gives to his motif different roles and significations that change with each work. The heart-butterfly, embodying the yearning for the other, can become, for example, a vehicle. In Restless Soul, it is a hot air balloon; in Faithfully Voyaging a man uses it as a vessel to navigate with his family the darkness of the night. In some other paintings, the heart-butterflies appear to be little companions to the lovers, a flock of friendly beings accompanying them in their quest for a meaningful life together. It takes two – to love, to live. In this series, Coplu uses the relationship between two beloveds as a metaphor for something bigger: the essential need that all things in life have for another in order to exist. ‘Everything takes two’, the artist told me. Like a lover needs her lover, fish need the sea; plants need the sun. Coplu clearly attempts to go beyond humankind’s particularities and touch on the intrinsic and intimate functioning of the world. Once again, the butterfly comes as a apt metaphor: by choosing such a short-lived and magnificent creature, Coplu not only captures in paint those relationships’ fleetingness, but he also alludes to the fragility of life – and the need to preserve it. From Dawn to Dusk is the very first painting Coplu made for this series. A man plays the guitar under a large tree that flutters with multicoloured heart-butterflies and his female counterpart stands nearby, listening. They both contemplate the ultramarine immensity of the sea as the sun sets. There is, in the piece, an inescapable feeling of calm and serenity, but also a sense of melancholy. The two characters don’t communicate at all with each other. They look afar, as if expecting something to come – or perhaps mediating over their past. In the 1980s Coplu worked as a cartoonist in his native Turkey. For five years, he contributed cartoons to the Turkish Daily News, and his illustrations have been published worldwide. The artist is now fully concentrating on painting, but something of cartoons’ visual efficiency remains in his pictorial language: a simple and accurate line, the directness of his images and their immediate impact. This impact is enhanced by the artist’s technique. Except for the backgrounds, all the subjects in Coplu’s paintings are applied on the canvas with a palette knife, a method which gives them a very distinctive texture. They are almost in relief, more fully present to the viewers with whom they seem to share the same space. Clearly influenced with Coplu’s past as a cartoonist, the characters themselves contribute to a sense of intimacy between painting and beholder. The artist has made his Adam & Eve very mundane. They are plump, with round bellies and thick fingers – remote from the idealised figures usually chosen to embody the mysteries of love between man and woman. Coplu’s lovers have something of the caricature about them, and their imperfections make them much easier to identify with. Moreover, as any of us would be, Coplu’s beloveds seem bemused by what’s happening to them – overwhelmed, perhaps, by the strength of their own feelings. Looking at this series, one could get the impression that these characters are always the same ones; that the works unravel as the different adventures of one single couple. A closer look reveals their differences, but together they nonetheless construct a meta-narrative embracing the development of a love affair. Each painting stands as a concise tableau, the embodiment of one of the myriad situations in which one can find oneself when looking for love or living in a relationship. And if there is an overarching feeling of joy in these works, Coplu doesn’t exclude more difficult aspects of love: the wait, the disappointment and the separation. The Relinquisher has a male figure carrying a butterfly net. The sky is teeming with magnificent heart-butterflies but he ignores them and looks away, as if waiting in vain for the missing one. In Young at Heart, a woman and her child see the father flying away, from flower to flower, deserting his family for more enticing pastures. In Restless Souls, the man in the hot air balloon gondola is reaching out with his butterfly net, as if unsatisfied with the woman standing quietly by his side. Love can be as painful as it can be fulfilling, and Coplu pictures it in all its complexity. In the end, though, happiness prevails. In Celebration
of
Faith
2, the lover has become a heart-butterfly
himself. His wings are spread under his body like a luxurious carpet,
more
adorned and intricate than the ones of any other heart-butterflies in
the
series. He has become love and floats in bliss. ‘Dream is power’, Coplu
told
me. The artist may claim not to be interested in real life, but his
paintings
bring us an irresistible energy. Each one is an encouragement to adopt
a
positive outlook on existence. They depict an oneiric and symbolic
world,
which, in its own way, contributes to the transformation of ours. Coline Milliard HOPES&WO ND E R S OF
EXISTENCE
![]() Coplu’s creatures appear soft and sweet
but they grapple with the same existential concerns as us all. Like
heroes from
a fable, the challenges that these sympathetic creatures address are
abstracted
versions of common human concerns. Their dramas and joys are compelling
metaphors for the fundamental issues underlining our universal struggle
for
understanding and happiness. In his current series, Coplu casts his
creatures within poetic scenarios involving oversized eggs. The eggs
are seen
either unbroken, as empty shells or presented like the delicious
highlight on a
breakfast plate. In both cases, the eggs serve as striking symbols of
life’s
potential and its mysteries. The Turkish-born Canadian artist’s use of
eggs reflects their power as symbols for creativity, purity, mortality
and
hope. As Picasso wrote, “When you start with a portrait and
search for a
pure form, a clear volume, through successive eliminations, you arrive
inevitably at the egg. Likewise, starting with the egg and following
the same
process in reverse, one finishes with the portrait.” Outside of art, eggs are simply the
origin of all life. Children often encounter their first experience of
birth by
watching a chick hatch from an egg. We may intellectually understand
the
importance of eggs in biology but seeing birds’ eggs hatch makes the
reality of
birth immediate and intimate without forcing a clear confrontation with
sexuality and the bloody biological reality of maternity in mammals. A
chick
popping out of an egg is as wondrous as magic. But it also educates
children in
the natural processes of life. Coplu’s male and female creatures have similarly plump bodies but his females possess distinctly maternal physiques. They have full bosoms and bountiful hair. They seem warm and motherly. Family and community are key to Coplu’s universe. The eggs symbolize potential birth in these images just as they do for children. Their appearance is joyful. Although the shells are empty, Coplu’s creatures fill them with love and hope. This symbolic significance is addressed
in many of Coplu’s egg images. In one painting, a couple sits together
in an
open eggshell. The egg itself has been removed and the couple chastely
inhabits
the shell but their presence together evokes their potential as
parents. In another image, the couple relaxes in
an eggshell floating through space attached to a balloon of clouds. In
Coplu’s work clouds represent dreams.
In this instance, the clouds clearly represent the couple’s *dreams and
the power of their love to hoist them
above otherwise rocky and bleak terrain.
The sky surrounding them is dark and turbulent. The ground is dotted
with eggs and hard hills. The earth beneath them seems precarious but
the dreams uphold the nest that they create together
in the eggshell. It is a lovely and
reassuring vision of domestic security and romantic contentment. A comparably mournful image shows the
same couple rests within their egg but it is no longer aloft. It is
grounded
and rooted in the dense earth. They watch two floating
clouds and appear to contemplate
their relationship. The sentiment is tender, not bitter. But a sense of
potential loss is still gently conveyed. Eggs’ potential as symbols of hope and
disappointment is illustrated in a dramatic painting by Coplu in which
one of
his creatures pushes a whole egg up a mountain while others watch. The
far side
of the mountain is crowded with forgotten eggs. The gesture seems
futile and
curious but the evident determination of the worker creates a sense
that the
activity itself provides potential solace and self-discovery, in
keeping with
some interpretations of the Sisyphus. One of the painting
evokes a proverb from Coplu’s native Turkey,
which translates into: “Today's egg is better than tomorrow's hen.” As
the
proverb makes clear, an egg has less objective value than a hen but it
is still
superior to the fantasy of a hen in the future. However, the existence
of
similar proverbs throughout multiple cultures demonstrates mankind’s
susceptibility
towards investing in fragile and false hope. The positive implication of this quote is
that hope can transcend reality. This sentiment possibly inspires the
group of
creatures gathered on a series of rocks watching another of their kind
travel
the sky in a vessel with an egg as it sails. Ironically, the egg is
sunny-side-up. In this state, it will clearly never become a chicken.
It’s
potential for giving life has been arrested. As food, a cooked egg can
contribute to another creature’s nourishment but it cannot
independently become
an autonomous thing. However, it’s appearance hovering above the heads
of
Coplu’s creatures still generates obvious hope within them. They gaze
at it
with understandable wonder and envy their brethren flying under its
steed. Although
eggs
represent
many
aspects
of
our
emotional
and
intellectual
investment
in
life’s
potential, eggs also signify the limits of our understanding of life.
Eggs’ simple
but significant symbolic meaning is summed up in the eternal conundrum:
which
came first, the chicken or egg? Like
Coplu’s charming characters, this riddle’s apparent simplicity belies
its
hidden profundity.
Ana Finel Honigman is a writer
living in Berlin
|